Adjusting NAT rules
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									c5947c45eb
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b4bdbe17a3
					
				@ -339,10 +339,11 @@ fi
 | 
			
		||||
if [ "$CONNTRACK" ]; then
 | 
			
		||||
	#$IPTABLES -A INPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} NEW -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A INPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	# Now in the NAT rules
 | 
			
		||||
	#$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	#$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} NEW -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT 
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} NEW -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT 
 | 
			
		||||
	#$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} NEW -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A INPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} INVALID -j DROP
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} INVALID -j DROP
 | 
			
		||||
	$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} INVALID -j DROP
 | 
			
		||||
@ -686,6 +687,7 @@ if [ $NAT ]; then
 | 
			
		||||
			SNAT)
 | 
			
		||||
				$IPTABLES -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j SNAT \
 | 
			
		||||
					-o ${NAT_RULE[3]} --to-source ${NAT_RULE[4]} 
 | 
			
		||||
				$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
				display_c DEFAULT "\t${GREEN}SNAT:${PURPLE}${NAT_RULE[1]}:${NAT_RULE[2]}${AQUA}->${BLUE}${NAT_RULE[3]}:${NAT_RULE[4]}"
 | 
			
		||||
				if [[ ! "$INIF_EXISTS" =~ "${NAT_RULE[1]}:${NAT_RULE[2]}" ]]; then
 | 
			
		||||
					$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type time-exceeded -i ${NAT_RULE[1]} \
 | 
			
		||||
@ -694,12 +696,6 @@ if [ $NAT ]; then
 | 
			
		||||
						-s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
					INIF_EXISTS="${INIF_EXISTS} ${NAT_RULE[1]}:${NAT_RULE[2]}"
 | 
			
		||||
				fi
 | 
			
		||||
				# This code seems pointless, anyone else have an opinion?
 | 
			
		||||
				#if [[ ! "$OUTIF_EXISTS" =~ "${NAT_RULE[3]}:${NAT_RULE[4]}" ]]; then
 | 
			
		||||
				#	$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type time-exceeded -o ${NAT_RULE[3]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
				#	$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type fragmentation-needed -o ${NAT_RULE[3]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
				#	OUTIF_EXISTS="${OUTIF_EXISTS} ${NAT_RULE[3]}:${NAT_RULE[4]}"
 | 
			
		||||
				#fi
 | 
			
		||||
				if [[ ! "$FWDIF_EXISTS" =~ "${NAT_RULE[1]}:${NAT_RULE[2]}:${NAT_RULE[3]}" ]]; then
 | 
			
		||||
					$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p icmp --icmp-type time-exceeded -i ${NAT_RULE[1]} -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} \
 | 
			
		||||
						-o ${NAT_RULE[3]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
@ -710,6 +706,7 @@ if [ $NAT ]; then
 | 
			
		||||
					;;
 | 
			
		||||
			MASQ)
 | 
			
		||||
				$IPTABLES -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j MASQUERADE -o ${NAT_RULE[3]}
 | 
			
		||||
				$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
				display_c DEFAULT "\t${GREEN}MASQ:${PURPLE}${NAT_RULE[2]}${AQUA}->${BLUE}${NAT_RULE[3]}"
 | 
			
		||||
				if [[ ! "$INIF_EXISTS" =~ "${NAT_RULE[1]}:${NAT_RULE[2]}" ]]; then
 | 
			
		||||
					$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type time-exceeded -i ${NAT_RULE[1]} \
 | 
			
		||||
@ -728,6 +725,7 @@ if [ $NAT ]; then
 | 
			
		||||
					;;
 | 
			
		||||
			NETMAP)
 | 
			
		||||
				$IPTABLES -A PREROUTING -t nat -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j NETMAP --to ${NAT_RULE[4]}
 | 
			
		||||
				$IPTABLES -A FORWARD ${M_STATE} ${C_STATE} RELATED,ESTABLISHED -s ${NAT_RULE[2]} -j ACCEPT
 | 
			
		||||
				display_c DEFAULT "\t${GREEN}NETMAP:${PURPLE}${NAT_RULE[2]}${AQUA}->${BLUE}${NAT_RULE[4]}"
 | 
			
		||||
				if [[ ! "$INIF_EXISTS" =~ "${NAT_RULE[1]}:${NAT_RULE[2]}" ]]; then
 | 
			
		||||
					$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type time-exceeded -i ${NAT_RULE[1]} \
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user